Is it legal to use AI to screen candidates in the UK?

Kit works inside your ATS. Kit recommends. Your people decide. Everyone for a job is asked the same questions. Under UK and EU GDPR.

"AI is biased."

The comparison is with today's process, not with perfection. Today a CV filter decides who gets an interview, assessing people on proxies: name, schools, gaps, job titles, years served. Only a few ever get one. Kit replaces that selection by CV. It doesn't replace the interview.

Kit starts from the real environment of the job: the manager, the team, the pace, what is genuinely hard about the role and what success looks like. Then it explores, with every applicant, whether they have the capabilities a person needs to thrive in that environment, and the examples that show it.

Everyone gets the same conversation about the same job and is scored against the same scorecard, from every source. In the trial, applicants reported gender discrimination at 3.30% with the AI against 5.98% with humans. Kit recommends and a person decides.

Kit's recommendation is information for a human, never a decision.

Kit recommends. The employer decides. Kit never rejects anyone.

Where a policy forbids any ranking, the conversation itself still gives the human far more to go on than a CV, for every applicant rather than a few.

Is it fair?

Only people who agree are assessed. Everyone for a job is asked the same way. Every recommendation shows its reasons. Your managers decide.

Your IT team's questions, answered before they ask.

Data: Kept in the EU, in Ireland, on AWS.

Privacy: UK and EU GDPR. Retention, deletion and access requests are in our data agreement.